Armor

The kabuto is an essential component of Japanese armor, holding a prominent place in the military history of feudal Japan. This elegant helmet not only protects the head and face of the warrior in combat situations but also represents a symbol of status and skill. Even today, the kabuto is used in traditional ceremonies and festivals, bestowing an air of reverence towards Japan's rich cultural heritage.

Kabutos are recognized for their captivating aesthetics, with intricate details that often reflect elements of nature, wildlife, and divine figures. As metallurgy technology advanced, designs became more complex, incorporating new ornamental elements and better materials. Initially, kabutos were simpler and more functional; however, over time they evolved into rich expressions of art and craftsmanship.

A distinctive aspect of the kabuto is the maedate, an ornament placed on the top of the helmet. Generally, this emblem was a metal crest or a sculpture representing the warrior or their clan, thereby allowing identification of their status and loyalties. Along with the maedate, another crucial element is the shikoro, a neck guard that hangs from the lower edge of the helmet, made up of multiple plates of metal or leather that provide additional security to the wearer.

Kabutos were considered family treasures, often passed down from generation to generation, and their care and maintenance were carried out with great diligence. Owning a kabuto was not only a symbol of wealth but also of a deep respect for the art of war. Today, they are admired in cultural festivals and parades, as well as being central pieces in art collections that preserve Japanese history.

In summary, the kabuto is not just a piece of armor; it is a testament to Japan's historical and artistic legacy, valued for both its functionality and aesthetic beauty.

The sode is a fundamental piece of the samurai armor, playing an essential role in the protection of the warrior. It is a rigid plate that protects the shoulders, fastening to the dō (central part of the armor) with straps and buckles, thus ensuring a secure and effective fit. The shape and size of the sode have evolved over the centuries, marking significant milestones in the history of Japanese armor.

During the Heian period (794-1185), the sode were relatively simple, exhibiting a rectangular design that covered only the shoulders. However, it was during the Muromachi period (1336-1573) that these pieces transformed into more elaborate elements, adopting curved shapes that not only protected the shoulders but also extended their coverage to the arms, offering greater defense in combat.

The materials used in the making of the sode vary considerably, adapting to factors such as budget, climate, and desired functionality. The sode could be made of:

• Leather: Flexible and lightweight, ideal for warm climates or for activities requiring agility, such as horseback riding.
• Silk: Often used for decoration, adding a touch of distinction.
• Metal: Provided greater protection, albeit at the cost of increased weight and reduced flexibility.
• Bamboo: A lighter and more versatile option that was also used in certain sode.

Beyond their defensive function, the sode were also a symbol of status and wealth. Samurai used these pieces to showcase their social distinction; some were decorated with intricate relief designs, such as flowers and animals, while others featured elaborate paintings or prints. Additionally, many sode incorporated the mon (family crest) of the samurai, facilitating the identification of the warrior in the heat of battle. In this way, the sode not only provided protection in battle but also served as a visual and symbolic record of the samurai's identity.

The Nodawa is a fundamental piece of traditional Japanese armor, specifically designed to protect the warrior's neck and throat during confrontations. This crucial component of the armor, which takes the shape of a metal plate, gently curves around the neck and secures to the shoulders, providing vital protection in one of the most exposed areas of the body in combat.

Beyond its physical protective function, the Nodawa also acts as a type of high collar, shielding the warrior from cold winds and rain, making it a practical element in the context of Japanese weather. Its design was not only focused on defense; over the centuries, the Nodawa also evolved aesthetically, incorporating a variety of styles and decorations. These embellishments often include intricate motifs of dragons, flowers, and other symbols that resonate with Japanese culture and mythology, adding a level of sophistication that elevated its value not just as protection, but also as a manifestation of art.

The Nodawa not only served as a protective element; it was also a symbol of status and rank within the Japanese army. Variations in its design and ornamentation could indicate the level of leadership or social position of the warrior wearing it. Thus, not only was the physical integrity of the combatant cared for, but their dignity and honor on the battlefield were also reflected.

Today, the Nodawa has become a piece of cultural and historical interest and can be seen in traditional Japanese armors used in ceremonies and historical festivals celebrating this rich heritage. Additionally, it is common to find it in museums that house collections of historical artifacts, as well as in private collections of Japanese armor enthusiasts.

This cultural legacy reminds us not only of the importance of the Nodawa as protection but also as a legacy of the rich martial tradition and aesthetics of Japanese history.

Quijotes or musleras are fundamental elements in the history of medieval armor, specifically designed to protect the upper legs, particularly the thighs, of warriors and knights on the battlefield. These armor components are the result of significant evolution over the centuries, reflecting the various protection needs that arose in different cultural and geographical contexts. During the Middle Ages, a period characterized by frequent armed conflicts, the demand for robust defenses was essential for surviving the assaults of weapons such as swords, spears, and arrows.

In their construction, quijotes or musleras are generally composed of several articulated metal plates, which can be made of steel or iron, connected by leather straps, rivets, or hinges. This articulation is essential, as it allows the warrior to maintain a degree of mobility and flexibility despite the weight of the protection. In addition to fulfilling their guarding function, quijotes integrate with other pieces of armor, such as the waist and greaves (which protect the shins), as well as the poleyns (intended to guard the knees). This comprehensive defense system provides complete coverage for the lower limbs, crucial for any combatant.

Quijotes also adapted to the diverse martial traditions of the cultures where they were employed. For example, some designs incorporated an additional protection known as

The armor ristre is a term that refers to the collection of weapons, tools, and accessories that a warrior or knight carried at their waist or hip during the medieval period. This repertoire included a variety of objects, such as swords, knives, axes, and war hammers, which were essential both in combat and personal defense. In addition to weapons, the ristre could incorporate indispensable tools such as sharpening stones, wallets, and provision bags, becoming an invaluable tool for those facing the dangers of the battlefield.

The importance of the armor ristre lies not only in its practical function during confrontations but also in the symbolism it represented. This collection of weapons and tools was secured to the warrior's waist with a leather or fabric belt, which often featured ornamental decorations that revealed the status and wealth of the bearer. Therefore, the ristre not only served as a means of defense but also as a showcase of the social and economic identity of the warrior.

Within this collection, the pouch was a particularly useful element. It allowed for the transport of essential provisions such as food and water, as well as the safeguarding of small objects like coins and tools. The design and ornamentation of these pouches varied depending on the social status of the warrior, reflecting their wealth and personal tastes.

In the broader context of medieval trade, armor ristras were also objects of exchange, and their quality could determine a knight's prestige in court or in battle. With the rise of weapons trade during the Middle Ages, these accessories began to be crafted with more detail and style, becoming truly unique and personalized pieces that laid the groundwork for the current market of medieval reproductions.

Thus, the armor ristre is much more than just a simple set of tools; it is a symbol of the medieval era that combines pragmatism and aesthetics, uniting personal defense with the expression of social status. These elements have notably influenced the cultural representation of medieval warriors today and continue to be of interest to collectors and enthusiasts of the medieval world.

The breastplate is one of the essential pieces of plate armor, a type of protection predominantly used during the medieval period. This form of armor is characterized by being made with metal plates that are assembled in a way that ensures extensive coverage of the wearer's body.

In particular, the breastplate efficiently covers the lower part of the torso and the abdomen, areas that are crucial and vulnerable in combat. This piece not only provides physical protection against cuts and blows but is also an essential element in the design of the armor. The breastplate is attached to the cuirass by means of straps or buckles, and works in conjunction with other parts of the armor, such as shoulder plates, greaves, and tassets, to offer comprehensive defense. On various occasions, the breastplate could be separated from the armor set, allowing the user to use it independently for more specific defense in the waist and abdomen area.

The popularity of the breastplate in Europe consolidated during the 14th century and continued to evolve through the 15th and 16th centuries. Over time, it transformed into a more complex and ornamental piece. Many of these breastplates were adorned with detailed engravings or inlays that not only increased their visual appeal but also enhanced their value as an art object. Aside from its defensive function, the breastplate had an aesthetic and symbolic meaning. It represented status and power, reflecting the skill and mastery of the armor maker who had crafted it. In some cases, these artisans incorporated coats of arms or family insignias into the breastplate, creating a unique and personalized piece, making it a significant element for its bearer.

The breastplate is not only a testament to the technological advancement in armor manufacturing but also reinforces the individuality and social achievements of the warriors and knights who wore it. This essential piece of plate armor reflects a balance between functionality and aesthetics, ensuring that its legacy endures throughout European military history and combat culture.

The barbera, also known as barbote, is a fundamental piece of medieval armor that played an essential role in protecting the warrior. This device was attached to the helmet to safeguard the lower part of the face, including the mouth, chin, and jaws. Throughout history, the barbera has received multiple names, such as babera, baberol, barberol, babador, barbique, baberón, barbete, and guardapapo.

Its use dates back to the mid-14th century, and its initial design was conceived to provide support for the bacinete, a type of helmet that, due to its weight and structure, could move unstably during combat. Over time, innovations such as the gorguera or gorguerín, which was attached to the coselete and espaldar with straps, significantly improved its functionality and protection.

The main function of the barbote is to secure the protection of the following areas of the warrior on the battlefield:

• Mouth
• Chin
• Jaws

Barbotes were commonly made of steel and iron, ensuring their resistance during fights.

Barbotes adapted in various ways to different types of helmets and headpieces of the time, demonstrating impressive versatility:

• Bacinete: The barbote was attached with straps or hinges, allowing the warrior to lift and lower it as needed, thus providing additional protection without sacrificing mobility.
• Closed helmet: In this type, the barbote was an integral part of the helmet, extending from the bottom to protect the warrior's face and neck.
• Great helmet: Designed to be more robust, the barbote in these helmets extended up to the upper chest, especially in the Spanish models of the 15th and 16th centuries, known as

The gorjal, also known as gorget, is a key piece of medieval armor designed to offer protection to the neck and upper chest of the warrior. Its importance in combat is undeniable, as it plays a critical role in defense during battles. Below are the most relevant aspects of this fundamental piece of war attire from the era:

Main Functions

• Neck Protection: Acts as the first line of defense for this vulnerable area, preventing cuts and thrusts.
• Structural Support: Provides a solid foundation for other pieces of armor, such as the helmet, increasing the warrior's stability and protection.
• Integration with Armor: Attaches to the breastplate and backplate, creating a protective wrap that ensures complete upper torso defense.

Main Characteristics

• Location: Positioned at the top of the chest, covering the back of the neck and shoulders.
• Structure: Generally consisted of a neck made of iron divided into two articulated pieces, designed for easy adjustment.
• Materials: Typically made of metal, such as iron or steel, which provided the necessary robustness to withstand impacts.

Evolution and Use

• It was one of the first pieces to be worn when dressing in armor.
• In some cases, a high gorjal could replace the collar, which specifically protected the front of the neck.
• Its design evolved to improve both mobility and protection, in response to changing combat tactics.

Fit and Comfort

The fit of the gorjal was essential for its effectiveness in combat. It was achieved through various methods:

• Articulated Design: Thanks to its construction in two pieces, the gorjal could be comfortably adjusted around the warrior's neck.
• Closure System: It usually closed with buckles and straps, allowing for personalized adjustment.
• Integration with Other Pieces: Joined to the breastplate and backplate, its design ensured it stayed in place during combat.
• Customized Fit: Armorers made gorjals to measure, ensuring an optimal fit for each warrior.
• Inner Padding: Often included leather or fabric padding for improved comfort.
• Ergonomic Shape: Its design follows the anatomy of the neck and shoulders for a more precise fit.

Critical Combat Situations

The gorjal became an indispensable piece in various battle situations:

• Protection Against Neck Attacks: Defends a vital area from cuts and thrusts.
• Defense Against Polearm Weapons: Helps deflect impacts in confrontations against spearmen.
• Close-Combat: Provides additional protection against opportunistic attacks.
• Cavalry Charges: Protects the rider during lateral and frontal impacts in initial clashes.
• Defense Against Projectiles: Although not its primary function, it can help reduce the impact of arrows.
• Support for the Helmet: Facilitates the weight distribution of the helmet, enhancing comfort in prolonged combats.
• Protection Against Rising Blows: Useful for safeguarding the neck and chin against upward attacks.

The gorjal, when integrated with other pieces of armor, formed a robust and effective defense system, crucial for the warrior's survival on the battlefield. Its design and functionality have left a significant mark in the history of personal protection in combat.

The alpartaz is a key piece in medieval armor, specifically a chainmail that protects the neck and shoulders of the warrior. Below are its main characteristics and importance in the historical context of armor.

Definition and Function

The alpartaz is a flexible curtain of mail, designed to offer protection to the most vulnerable parts of the body during combat. Its main function is:

• To protect the warrior's neck and shoulders from direct attacks.
• To allow free movement of the neck, essential for mobility in combat.
• To complement the overall protection provided by other parts of the armor, such as the helmet and gorget.

Characteristics of the Alpartaz

Among the characteristics of the alpartaz, we can highlight:

• Material: It is generally made of metal mesh, providing both flexibility and strength.
• Location: It attaches to the edge of the helmet, ensuring a secure transition between the head and torso.
• Coverage: It extends from the helmet to the area of the neck and shoulders, ensuring continuous protection.

Historical Importance of the Alpartaz

The alpartaz played a fundamental role in the evolution of medieval armor. Its contributions are especially notable in:

• Protection of vulnerable areas: The neck and shoulders are exposed areas, and the alpartaz was specifically designed to reduce risks in these zones.
• Flexibility: Its structure allowed freedom of movement, something essential in battles where agility could be the difference between life and death.
• Composition of complete armors: By the end of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, warriors wore complex armors that could consist of up to 250 articulated pieces and weighed between 25 and 30 kg.

Materials Used in the Manufacture of the Alpartaz

For the construction of an alpartaz, specific materials were used that guaranteed its functionality:

• Steel mesh: The main element, composed of interconnected steel rings with an approximate diameter of 8 mm. This interlacing pattern (4 rings to 1) offered good protection and flexibility.
• Leather: At the top of the alpartaz, a strap of cowhide is incorporated to facilitate attachment to the helmet.
• Fastening elements: Vervelles (small brass pieces) or leather cords were used to attach the alpartaz to the helmet, allowing easy disassembly for maintenance.

Fastening Methods

1. Vervelles: These were fixed around the lower edge of the helmet, allowing a secure and accessible connection.
2. Leather cords: They were threaded through holes in the edge of the helmet, intertwining with the mesh of the alpartaz.
3. Wire: Similar to the use of cord, but using wire to secure the alpartaz to the helmet.

The alpartaz is a testament to the evolution of armor technology, which not only provided protection but also combined design and functionality exceptionally in the wartime context of the era.

Escarcelas, derived from the Italian term scarsella, are fascinating historical pieces that played an essential role in the armor of knights during the 14th and 15th centuries, particularly in Italy. These pieces were not only functional but often featured artistic designs and various styles that reflected the cultural richness of the time.

In the context of medieval armor, escarcelas were protective elements suspended from the belt, secured to the skirt of the breastplate with straps and buckles. Their fundamental purpose was to cover the weak point located between the skirt of the breastplate and the greaves, protecting the groin area and preventing the adversary's lances from inflicting damage on one of the knight's most vulnerable areas.

Characteristics and Evolution of Escarcelas

• Design:
  • They generally consist of plates shaped like tiles, with an edge on the vertical axis.
  • They were worn symmetrically, one on each side of the body, although in cavalry armor, the right escarcela could be shorter than the left to facilitate mounting.
• Evolution:
  • Initially, they were nailed to the skirt of the breastplate, but later they were secured with straps to provide greater flexibility and mobility.
  • During the 15th century, the transformation into Gothic armors allowed the use of curved and radiated edges, improving aesthetics and functionality.
  • From the 16th century onwards, escarcelas were made in multiple articulated pieces, providing superior mobility for knights on the battlefield.

Variations in Design

• Foot combat armors: Often included additional escarcelas that hung from the backplate to protect the coccyx.
• 15th-century armors: Some versions featured two smaller escarcelas flanking the main ones, thus improving thigh coverage.
• French armors: Until 1470, escarcelas were of equal dimensions, creating an aesthetic effect similar to a plate skirt.

Materials and Construction

Escarcelas were made from different materials, defined by their use and context:

• Metal: Generally steel, with thicknesses of up to 1.2 mm, ensuring resistance without compromising movement.
• Leather: Some versions, especially for historical reenactments or LARP (live-action role play), were made of leather, offering a lighter alternative.

Escarcelas are a clear example of how functionality and aesthetics came together in medieval armor, not only providing protection but also reflecting the culture and lifestyle of an era influenced by war and cavalry. These pieces continue to be of interest to historians, collectors, and enthusiasts of historical reenactment.

Codales are fundamental components of armor used during the medieval period, specifically designed to protect the elbow joint. Below, we will detail their characteristics, evolution, and function within the context of medieval armor.

Definition and Function

Codales are pieces of armor that cover and protect the elbow, one of the most vulnerable joints during combat. Their main function is to provide defense in this area, minimizing the risk of injury from weapons such as spears or arrows.

Historical Evolution

• Origin: Codales began to be used in the 13th century, marking their presence as key elements of armor.
• Early designs: The first codales were small and conical, attached to the arm by a strap.
• Improvements and adaptations: Over time, codales were refined through the addition of a washer known as a "guarda-codal," which offered greater protection.

Characteristics and Design

• Composition: Codales were made of metal and could consist of one or more plates that provided flexibility.
• Shape: Their design evolved from conical structures to more enveloping shapes that ensured better coverage. This included adapting their size, sometimes making the right codal larger, as this arm was more exposed in combat.

Integration with Other Armor Pieces

Codales were part of a broader protection system that included:

• Arm guards: Provided protection to the upper arm.
• Bracers: Covered the forearm, complementing the defense.
• Crabs: Located opposite the elbow, ensuring comprehensive protection for the warrior's arm.

Together, these pieces of armor formed a set that offered not only protection but also the mobility necessary for effective combat.

Decorative and Aesthetic Aspects

Starting from the second half of the 15th century, many codales began to be decorated with engravings and artistic shapes. This not only served as a means of protection but also reflected the social status of the warrior wearing them, transforming armor into a symbol of distinction and power.

Codales are, without a doubt, a vital piece of medieval armor, intended to protect one of the most critical areas of the body during combat. Their evolution reflects not only advances in armory techniques but also a development in how warriors understood and valued personal protection.

Greaves are a key piece of medieval armor, playing a fundamental role in protecting the warrior's legs during combat. They provide security in one of the body's most vulnerable areas. Below are their characteristics, functions, materials, and historical evolution.

Characteristics of Greaves

• Coverage: They are designed to protect the front and sides of the legs, covering from the knee to the ankle.
• Material: Commonly made of metal, especially steel or iron, although other materials were also used.
• Design: They can be made in one piece or articulated, allowing greater mobility for the warrior.

Types of Greaves

• Half Greaves: Some versions feature articulated half greaves that protect the lower part of the knees.
• Grebettes: These were specific pieces designed to protect the calves.

Functions of Greaves

• They protect against cuts and blows aimed at the legs.
• They defend against attacks from short weapons in close combat.
• They provide additional stability to the warrior during combat.

Historical Evolution

• Origin: Greaves have a long history, dating back to ancient Rome.
• Greaves in Rome: Hastati, heavy infantry soldiers, typically wore greaves on their right leg, which was advanced in combat.
• Middle Ages: Their design was refined, becoming an essential part of full plate armor.

Materials Used in Greaves

• Metal:
  • Iron: The most common material for making greaves during the late Middle Ages.
  • Steel: Used for more resistant and durable productions.
  • Bronze: Employed in ancient times, modeled after Etruscan greaves.
• Leather:
  • Hardened leather: Frequently used as a lighter alternative to metal.
  • Boiled leather: This treatment increased the hardness of the leather, making it more resistant to impacts.

In summary, greaves offer a combination of protection and functionality that has endured throughout history, adapting to the needs of warriors and advances in weaponry and combat techniques. Their importance in medieval armor makes them a key piece for understanding the evolution of protection in warfare.

The aiglets, also known as agelets, are small yet significant accessories that have their roots in historical clothing, especially in outfits from periods such as the medieval and Renaissance eras. Their main function is to secure the laces on garments like doublets and gambesons, providing both functionality and an aesthetic touch to the attire.

Characteristics of Aiglets

• Materials: Often, aiglets are made of metal, with brass being one of the most common materials due to its durability and authentic appearance. Solid brass aiglets are particularly popular among historical reenactment enthusiasts, as they offer superior quality that resembles the originals.
• Size: The size of aiglets can vary, although it is common to find models that measure approximately 3.8 cm. This size is ideal for use in various historical garments.
• Style: Beyond their practical utility, aiglets also add a decorative element to clothing. They are crucial for achieving an authentic look in historical reenactments, theater, or themed costumes. Their design can range from simple to elaborately ornate, allowing for personal expression within historical contexts.

In summary, aiglets are more than just simple accessories; they are essential elements that contribute to the authenticity and aesthetics of historical clothing. Their proper use not only enhances the functionality of garments but also allows for a journey through time via the fashion of past eras.

The Roman galea is an emblematic helmet that was an essential part of the military equipment of Roman legionaries during the times of the Republic and the Empire. Its ingenious design was not only aimed at providing protection on the battlefield but also symbolized the pride and discipline of the Roman armed forces.

Origin and Characteristics of the Roman Galea

Used since the 4th century BC and evolving over time, the galea replaced earlier helmets like the Montefortino and the Coolus. Its most distinctive feature is that, unlike other helmets, such as the cassis which was made of metal, the galea was commonly made from leather, offering a balance between protection and comfort.

Essential Design

• Structure: The galea featured an elongated shape that tapered towards the top, improving the soldier's aerodynamics and vision.
• Materials: Although it included leather, some models were made in bronze or iron, especially during the imperial period, providing more resistance and security.
• Refined Protection: Many galeas had reinforcements to protect the cheeks and neck, allowing legionaries to better face the risks of combat.

The Galea in the Roman Military Context

The use of the galea was common among legionaries, who understood that their effectiveness in combat was closely related to the equipment they carried. This helmet not only provided protection but also helped identify ranks and roles within the military unit.

Identification and Symbology

• Sign of Rank: The different variants of the galea allowed distinguishing between soldiers, officers, and different units, creating order within the battlefield.
• Tactical Evolution: Over time, the design of the galea adapted to new tactics and technologies, demonstrating the constant innovation of the Roman army.

A Lasting Legacy

The Roman galea is a symbol of the military ingenuity and discipline of the Roman army. Its design and evolution reflect not only the need for protection but also the complexity of combat tactics of the era. This helmet represents a fascinating chapter in military history, showing how Roman armor adapted over time to face the challenges of a constantly changing world.

The Roman Subarmalis is a historical garment that played a vital role in the clothing and protection of soldiers during the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. This innovative piece of armor not only offered comfort but also provided crucial defense on the battlefield.

Origin and History

The design of the Subarmalis is inspired by more primitive versions used by Greek peoples. Over time, the Romans made adjustments that optimized its functionality and comfort, making it an essential element of the Roman military arsenal.

Features of the Subarmalis

• Materials: Generally made of treated leather or padded fabrics, the Subarmalis offered durability and impact resistance.
• Design: It featured laces or fastenings that allowed for a tight fit to the body, ensuring that the garment did not move during combat.
• Layers of Protection: It was strategically placed under armor, such as the lorica hamata (chain mail) or the lorica segmentata, providing additional defense against blows and bruises.

Use on the Battlefield

The Subarmalis was commonly used by both Roman and Byzantine troops and was considered indispensable for any soldier equipped with armor. Its main function was:

• Cushioning the impact of enemy weapons, especially in hand-to-hand combat.
• Protecting the soldier's torso and limbs, reducing the risk of serious injuries.

Impact on Military History

The utility of the Roman Subarmalis paved the way for the evolution of military garments. Its design not only benefited the soldiers in their performance but also laid the foundations for future innovations in personal protection. The legacy of this garment can be seen in the ongoing research and historical reenactment carried out by reenactor groups and academics, highlighting its importance over the centuries.

The escarcelas, also known as tassets, are distinctive elements of medieval armor that have captured the attention of historians and cultural heritage enthusiasts. Derived from the Italian term scarsella, these pieces, which flourished in the 14th and 15th centuries, have been recognized for their functionality and detailed artistic design.

Function of Escarcelas

The escarcelas were vital in protecting the knight in combat. Suspended from the belt and attached to the breastplate's fauld by straps and buckles, they covered the vulnerable gap between the breastplate and the cuisses. In this way, they safeguarded the groin, one of the most exposed areas to attacks on the battlefield.

Details and Evolution of Escarcelas

• Main Characteristics:
  • They generally had a tile shape with vertical edges, offering suitable aesthetics and functionality.
  • They were used symmetrically, although in some armors the right tasset could be shorter to facilitate horseback riding.
• Historical Evolution:
  • Initially, they were fixed to the fauld, but they evolved to offer more mobility using straps.
  • In the 15th century, the incorporation of Gothic designs allowed curved and radiated edges, improving their appearance.
  • From the 16th century, an articulated version was created that provided knights greater freedom of movement.

Design and Materials in Escarcelas

• Design Variations:
  • In armor for foot combat, it is common to see additional tassets that protect the coccyx.
  • Some 15th-century armors incorporated small tassets on the sides for greater coverage.
  • French armors before 1470 were of equal size, creating an effect similar to a plate skirt.
• Materials Used:
  • Mainly metal, made of strong steel up to 1.2 mm thick, ensuring protection without sacrificing mobility.
  • Leather was a popular alternative in historical reenactments and role-playing games, providing a lighter option.

Cultural Importance and Legacy

The escarcelas not only were fundamental in the physical protection of knights but also reflect a rich artisanal culture. They are a testament to the human ingenuity of the time, where functionality joined aesthetics, capturing the splendor of an era marked by chivalry and war. Their legacy continues to be an object of study and appreciation today, fascinating those who explore the history of medieval armor.

The helm is one of the most emblematic components of medieval armor, designed to provide vital protection to the warrior's head and face in battles and tournaments. The history of the helm is rich and varied, reflecting the evolution of combat technology and the art of metallurgy over the centuries.

History and Evolution of the Helm

From its beginnings, the helm has been fundamental in the evolution of armor. The earliest helms, which appeared thousands of years ago, offered basic protection. However, as more advanced manufacturing techniques developed, helms began to include decorative details and specific features to improve defense and comfort.

Helm Design

The design of the helm varied greatly over time:

• Initial Style: The earliest helms were simple; often flat and unornamented.
• Advanced Features: Over time, blacksmiths began incorporating elements like crests to deflect impacts and movable visors to enhance visibility.

Types of Helms

There are several types of helms, each suitable for specific contexts and fighting styles:

• Great Helm: Completely covers the head and face, with slots for vision. It was commonly used in the early Middle Ages.
• Basinet Helm: Provides comprehensive protection, with movable visors that improve visibility. Popularized in the 14th and 15th centuries.
• Nasal Helm: Known for its lightweight design, but offers less protection compared to other types, leaving part of the face exposed.

Function of the Helm in Battle

The helm not only serves to protect; it was also designed to terrify the enemy. Many helms featured ornaments resembling animal heads or had threatening styles, increasing intimidation on the battlefield.

The Helm in Culture and Fiction

Beyond its role in war, the helm has found its way into mythology and literature. In Greek mythology, the helm of invisibility is mentioned, while in "Don Quixote," there is a reference to the famous helm of Mambrino, which turns out to be a simple basin.

The bascinet is one of the most emblematic helmets of the Middle Ages, extensively used by knights and soldiers from the late 13th century until the first third of the 15th century. This helmet not only offered protection but also reflected the strategic and technological evolution of the era.

Origin and Characteristics of the Bascinet

The term "bascinet" comes from the Latin *bacinetum*. Some believe its name is related to its resemblance to a basin or container. This helmet emerged as a revolutionary option against the heavy helms of the time, providing lighter and more practical protection for the medieval warrior.

• Initial Design: The bascinet had a hemispherical shape covering the head, ears, and neck, offering protection without sacrificing mobility.
• Evolution: Over time, some models adopted a pointed design at the top, while the addition of visors improved facial defense.
• Options: It could be found with or without a visor, depending on the historical period and region in which it was used.

The Role of the Bascinet in Combat

Initially, the bascinet was used as an extra layer of protection under the helm, as complete helms were uncomfortable and too heavy for long combat periods. This circumstance motivated soldiers to replace the helm with the bascinet by removing the former.

Main Stages of Its Evolution:

1. **Implementation of the Visor:** In the 14th century, to protect the exposed face, movable visors began to be added. These evolved from simple options, such as a "movable trap" around 1310, to more sophisticated designs with a conical shape around 1350. 2. **Structural Improvements:** From 1380, the design of the bascinet expanded its protection to include shoulder support. At this stage, visors adopted a more hemispherical shape instead of a conical one. This final design offered more comfort and defense in combat.

Regional Diversity and Types of Bascinets

The popularity of the bascinet spread throughout Europe, adopting variations according to local needs:

• Spain: Here the bascinet usually had an ovoid and pointed shape, with a flat visor. It is celebrated in historical documents like the codex of the Trojan War (14th century).
• Bascinet with Nasal: This older model incorporates an extension to protect the nose and was particularly common in the Iberian Peninsula.
• German Models: Reinforced bascinets known as "embattlement" were developed, widely used by German soldiers.

The Legacy of the Bascinet

The bascinet was not only a protection tool but also marked a significant transition in medieval armor design. Its evolution demonstrates how technological advances and battlefield needs shaped military equipment. With its adaptable design, regional variations, and multiple variants, the bascinet continues to be a subject of study and fascination for those interested in military history and culture.

The history and evolution of medieval armor allow us to glimpse an era where survival on the battlefield depended as much on the warrior's skill as on the effectiveness of their protection. In this context, plate armor and chainmail emerged as two of the most prominent options. Each offered unique advantages and limitations that directly influenced combat tactics. It is worth exploring these differences in depth to understand why both were fundamental in their time.

Plate Armor: Strength and Modernity

Plate armor, also known as full metal armor, represented a significant advance in personal protection during the height of the Middle Ages, approximately from the 14th century. This equipment consisted of steel plates strategically assembled to cover vital areas of the body, such as the chest, abdomen, arms, and legs.

• Material and construction: Usually made of steel, a metal that offered high resistance to blunt and cutting attacks. The pieces were joined using rivets and leather straps, providing the warrior with a certain degree of mobility.
• Effectiveness against weapons: It offered a superior level of protection, especially against blows from maces or swords. The plates distributed the impact of blunt weapons over a wider surface, reducing the risk of severe fractures.
• Limitations: Its main drawback was the weight, which ranged between 20 and 25 kg, requiring significant physical training from its wearer. Additionally, its rigidity could limit certain agile movements on the battlefield.

Chainmail: Flexibility and Versatility

Chainmail has much older origins, dating back several centuries before the Middle Ages. This type of armor was composed of small interlinked rings, usually made of steel or iron, designed to cover the torso and, in many cases, the arms, legs, and head.

• Material and construction: Its design allowed for great flexibility, as each ring was connected to four or six adjacent rings. This made it an excellent option for more agile combat.
• Effectiveness against weapons: It effectively protected against cuts and lacerations. However, it could not completely prevent damage from blunt weapons, such as war hammers or heavy projectiles that crushed the rings.
• Limitations: Although it was less restrictive in terms of mobility, chainmail could be penetrated by thrusting attacks, such as spears or crossbow bolts. Additionally, its weight, which ranged from 10-15 kg, was less evenly distributed and rested mainly on the shoulders, which could become uncomfortable over long periods.

Key Comparison Between Plate Armor and Chainmail

While both armors were iconic in their respective eras, they differed significantly in terms of design, effectiveness, and purpose in combat. Below is a direct comparison:

Strategic Choice

The choice between plate armor or chainmail ultimately depended on the combat style and the prevailing threats on the battlefield. While plate armor offered greater protection against piercing and blunt weapons, chainmail excelled in flexibility and freedom of movement.

During the Middle Ages, the development of armor was vital for the protection of warriors on the battlefield. Among the most notable defensive elements, helmets played a fundamental role. In this article, we will explore a detailed comparison between two of the most iconic helmets of this era: the bascinet and the spangenhelm. We will analyze their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, evolution, and the impact they left on history.

Design and Features

The Bascinet Helmet

The bascinet is easily recognizable due to its rounded shape and integral coverage, protecting both the head and neck of the warrior. This design stood out during the late medieval period for its combination of protection and mobility.

• Material: Made primarily of steel. Early versions were crafted from forged iron.
• Flip-up visor: Featured a mobile visor that allowed for adjusting protection levels as needed.
• Protection: Its structure fully covered the head and neck.

Advantages:

• Provided integral protection, significantly reducing damage from cuts and blows.
• Its compact design allowed for greater mobility compared to other closed helmets.

Disadvantages:

• Its visor could limit peripheral vision.
• The lack of ventilation could cause discomfort during prolonged combat.
• Heavier models led to fatigue after extended use.

The Spangenhelm Helmet

The spangenhelm, also known as the segmented helmet, gained popularity between the 6th and 11th centuries. Its modular design made it easier to construct, offering an economical and effective option.

• Structure: Made up of metal strips joining various steel or bronze plates.
• Conical shape: Designed to deflect blows to the sides rather than absorb them directly.
• Options: Some models included nasal protection and cheek flaps made of metal or leather.

Advantages:

• Ease of manufacturing thanks to its segmented design.
• Offered additional protection options, such as nasal or ocular protection.

Disadvantages:

• Unlike the bascinet, it did not provide integral protection.
• The joints between segments made its structure more vulnerable at certain points.

Evolution and Historical Use

Bascinet

The bascinet was developed in response to the needs of infantry and cavalry, becoming a symbol of medieval armor from the 14th century onward. However, with the advent of more effective firearms, it lost relevance and was replaced by more robust closed helmets, like the cabasset, by the late 15th century.

Spangenhelm

The spangenhelm originated earlier, arriving in Western Europe through nomadic Iranian tribes like the Scythians and Sarmatians. It gained popularity during the Early Middle Ages until simpler designs, such as nasal helmets, became dominant.

Legacy and Relevance

Bascinet

The bascinet's design laid the foundation for future military helmets. Its influence can still be traced in steel helmet models used during world wars. Moreover, its focus on balancing protection and mobility continues to be relevant in the modern production of protective equipment.

Spangenhelm

Although surpassed by other designs, the spangenhelm left its mark on military history. Its segmentation inspired later technologies in various cultures, showcasing its adaptability as a key feature.

Both the bascinet and the spangenhelm represent the ongoing evolution of military technology during the Middle Ages, each with its strengths and limitations. These helmets not only protected warriors of their time but also established a lasting legacy in the history of armor and military design.

The helmet is a military helmet used since the early years of the 15th century. Its design represented a significant evolution from earlier helmets, such as the bascinet, and was distinguished from the sallet by its specific characteristics. Aiming to provide more effective and functional protection on the battlefield, the helmet quickly established itself as an essential piece of armor for the fighters of the time.

Origin and Development

The helmet emerged in the region of Germany in the early 15th century, and its popularity quickly spread throughout Europe. It could be part of a complete suit of armor or used as independent head protection. One of the most characteristic elements of its design was the large rear flaps that offered effective protection for the nape, making it an ideal option for both knights and infantry troops.

Characteristics of the Helmet

• Movable Visor: The helmet featured a movable visor that was attached to the sides of the helmet, leaving space for vision. However, this design risked allowing the entry of a spearhead through the opening.
• Articulated Nape Guard: Unlike the bascinet, which used mesh nape guards, the helmet was equipped with articulated steel plates, providing greater protection without restricting movement.
• Variety of Types: There were several types of helmets, including the barbute helmet, the gorget helmet, the infant helmet, the pavilion helmet, the morion helmet, and the Venetian or stradiot helmet.
• Decoration and Ornaments: The helmets of wealthy individuals were often richly decorated, featuring luxurious fittings and sometimes even horsehair padding.

Use in the Context of Warfare

Between 1450 and 1500, helmets became the preferred choice for head protection in combat. Their design, though simple, proved extremely effective, leading to their adoption by both knights and infantry troops. In addition to offering physical protection, the helmet had a significant psychological effect due to its "dehumanized" design, characteristic of mercenary troops.

Historical Examples and Cultural Significance

Historical helmets are prized in museum collections, with designs dating mainly from the late 15th century. Many of these pieces feature perforated visors for improved breathing, combs, and chinstraps. In addition to their use in combat, they are mentioned in historical records as those used by the soldiers of King Alfonso V of Aragon and are represented in bas-reliefs on structures such as the arch in Naples dedicated to this monarch.

Ultimately, the helmet marked a milestone in the evolution of medieval armor, offering a balance between protection and mobility, and became a symbol of both military innovation and social status in its time.

The morion is a type of medieval helmet that played a significant role during the Modern Age, especially in the Kingdom of Castile and in other European countries between the 16th and 17th centuries. This emblematic helmet is not only a symbol of the rich military history but also represents the adaptation and evolution of the armors used by soldiers over time.

Origins and Description

The morion emerged as an evolution of the medieval cabe-p, taking inspiration specifically from the Kettle Hat. Its design is easily recognizable by its conical shape and its characteristic crest, similar to a sharp blade, that runs along the top. The wide wings that extend to the sides were crucial in providing additional protection to the neck and shoulders, deflecting impacts toward less vulnerable areas such as the nape and ears.

Use in Infantry

While the morion is predominantly associated with the Spanish tercios and the conquerors of America, its use was much broader. Infantry soldiers, commoners, and even knights and high-ranking figures preferred this type of helmet. Its lightness and ability to leave the face exposed facilitated breathing and improved visibility during combat. Within the Spanish tercios, it was common among pikemen and arquebusiers, although musketeers opted for the chambergo hat as an alternative.

Functional Characteristics

The design of the morion was not only aesthetically distinctive but also functional. Inside, the helmet was equipped with crossed straps that served to support the head, ensuring ventilation and cushioning against vertical impacts. A fabric lining on the inside provided comfort and allowed for a proper fit to different head sizes, while a chin strap kept the helmet secure during combat.

Use in Europe and America

The morion spread beyond Spanish borders, being adopted by numerous armies in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries. It also had a presence on the American continent, as evidenced by pieces preserved in museums in North and South America. Despite its association with Spanish conquerors, its use was common among various military forces of the time.

Evolution and Disappearance

With the advancement of military technology and improvements in firearms towards the end of the 17th century, the morion gradually fell out of use. However, its name was revived in the late 19th century in Germany to describe a chapeau, which is a type of military hat without wings and with a visor.

Historical Legacy

Although the morion is no longer an essential element in the art of war, its legacy endures. It symbolizes the expansion and cultural influence of Spain in the world. Today, the morion remains part of the uniform of the Swiss Guard of the Vatican, and its design continues to be admired in replicas, historical recreations, and themed events.

In summary, the morion is more than just a simple helmet. It is, without a doubt, a living testament to the history, culture, and military achievements of past times. Its design served not only a practical function but also told its own stories in the battles where it was a witness.

The **Loricata Segmentata** is an iconic armor of the Roman Empire, primarily used by legionaries during the High Empire, specifically between the 1st century BC and the 3rd century AD. Its design is characterized by being segmented, composed of individual metal plates connected through internal leather strips. This arrangement allows for greater flexibility and mobility for the soldier who wears it.

Description and Structure

The structure of the **Loricata Segmentata** is innovative for its time. It consists of metal bands, typically made of iron, that are placed horizontally across the chest and back of the soldier.

• These bands are joined by vertical leather straps, increasing mobility.
• It opens from one side, facilitating adjustment and removal.

Additionally, it features other vertical metal bands in the shoulder area, ensuring protection. Although the arms remain unprotected, the typical Roman formation minimizes their exposure.

Evolution and Types

Over the centuries, the **Loricata Segmentata** evolved, adapting to the needs of combat:

• Loricata Segmentata Kalkriese: The most primitive type, used between 20 BC and 250 AD, even during the crucial Battle of Teutoburg.
• Loricata Segmentata Corbridge: Notable for the robust connection between the upper and lower parts via buckles and hooks, featuring large pectoral plates.
• Newstead: This variant increased the hinges at the shoulders, eliminating straps and further improving mobility.

Use and Advantages

The **Loricata Segmentata** was a distinctive feature of the Roman legionary and, occasionally, of the praetorians. However, auxiliary forces tended to use other armors such as **lorica hamata** (chainmail) or **lorica squamata** (scale armor).

The advantages of the **Loricata Segmentata** were significant:

• It provides superior protection compared to chainmail, although there are debates about the extent of its advantage.
• Mobility is one of its standout features, allowing the user to move freely in combat.

Disadvantages and Disappearance

Despite its benefits, the **Loricata Segmentata** had drawbacks that led to its disappearance:

• It requires a high level of skill for its manufacture, which significantly increases costs.
• The economic crises of the 2nd and 3rd centuries led to a shift towards more economical protection solutions like chainmail.

Iconography and Representation

The **Loricata Segmentata** has been immortalized in numerous historical reliefs. A famous example is its representation on the Trajan's Column, which depicts legionaries equipped with the Corbridge model. Although there may be variations for propagandistic reasons, these representations help us better understand its use and historical significance.

In conclusion, the **Loricata Segmentata** symbolizes the innovation and strength of the Roman army during a crucial period of its history. Its segmented design allowed for a unique combination of protection and mobility, although the complexity and cost of its manufacture limited its use to economically less conflictive periods.

The **Lorica Hamata** is an emblematic armor of ancient Rome, known for its extensive use in the Roman Legion during the periods of the Republic and Empire. This type of chainmail armor stands out for its flexibility and strength, being fundamental in the protection of Roman soldiers for centuries. With an innovative design based on Celtic techniques, the Lorica Hamata marked a milestone in the history of ancient armors.

Origin and Development

The origins of the **Lorica Hamata** can be traced back to ancient Celtic civilizations, where a primitive type of chainmail was adopted and improved by the Romans. The term "lorica" in Latin translates to "armor" or "breastplate," while "hamata" derives from "hamus," meaning "hook" or "chain." This armor became a fundamental part of Roman military equipment, reflecting both Celtic influence and the adaptability and evolution of Roman military technology.

Main Features

• Construction: The **Lorica Hamata** was made up of small rings of bronze or iron, arranged in vertical and horizontal rows, all interlinked. Each ring had an internal diameter of approximately 5 mm and an external diameter of 7 mm, providing great flexibility and strength.
• Shoulder Protection: The shoulder pauldrons used a design similar to that of the Greek **Linothorax**, covering from the mid-back to the front of the torso, connected by metal fasteners.
• Versatility: Adapted for different types of troops such as scouts, cavalry, or spearmen, the Lorica Hamata offered customized protection according to the military activity of each soldier.

Use and Historical Significance

The **Lorica Hamata** was used throughout the development of the Roman Empire, becoming the standard for auxiliary troops and central to the equipment of the legionaries. It represented a significant advancement in military technology, offering an optimal combination of protection and mobility. Its design allowed soldiers to fight effectively and for extended periods due to its relatively low weight and adaptability. Additionally, the Lorica Hamata was durable and easy to maintain, allowing for the repair or replacement of damaged parts with ease, making it viable for prolonged use.

Impact on Military Technology

The influence of the **Lorica Hamata** transcended the Roman military sphere, affecting other civilizations throughout the vast Empire. From Brittania to North Africa, and from Hispania to the eastern frontiers, the design of the Lorica Hamata expanded its reach, reflecting its importance in military history. These contributions not only improved the effectiveness of Roman soldiers but also laid the foundations for future armors in subsequent centuries.

The **Lorica Hamata** is not only fundamental to understanding the military tactics of ancient Rome, but it also illustrates the skill of innovation and adaptation in ancient warfare technology. Its legacy endures as a testament to Roman engineering and military strategy.

The Gjermundbu helmet is one of the most emblematic pieces of Viking archaeology and offers a fascinating glimpse into military tactics and culture at the end of the 9th century. This impressive defensive helmet, classified within the type known as "spectacle helmets," has captured the attention of historians and archaeologists due to its unique design and historical importance. Below, we will explore its features, history, and significance in detail.

Features of the Gjermundbu Helmet

The Gjermundbu helmet is a remarkable example of Viking metallurgical skill. Here are its most notable features:

• Origin and Era: Although its roots are found in the Vendel Era, the helmet was mainly used during the Viking Age, around the year 875. This period is known for the frequent conflicts and territorial expansion of the Vikings.
• Design: The helmet is made of iron and consists of three main plates that form a semi-spherical structure. These plates are joined by riveted metal, ensuring its solidity. The design includes a distinctive spectacle-shaped face guard that is both functional and indicative of the style.
• Face Guard: The front of the helmet features a metal visor that protected the face of the wearer, an essential feature of "spectacle helmets." This element would have provided crucial defense in close combat.
• Connection with Neck Guard: At the base of the helmet, there are holes that were likely used to connect the helmet with a neck guard. This accessory, similar to a chainmail, provided additional protection to the user.

Discovery and Historical Context

• Discovery: The helmet was unearthed on March 30, 1943, by Lars Gjermundbu, in Ringerike, Norway. It was found in fragments within a burial mound, suggesting Viking funerary customs.
• Funerary Context: The objects recovered from the grave indicate that they belonged to a person of high status, such as a noble or monarch from the kingdom of Ringerike. Among these items were swords, spears, axes, and equestrian equipment, typical accessories of a high-ranking warrior.

Historical Significance

• Importance: Notably, the Gjermundbu helmet represents the only completely intact example of a Viking helmet discovered to date. This fact emphasizes its uniqueness and advanced craftsmanship.
• Reserved for Royalty: It is believed that only individuals close to royalty or leaders of the hird, the king's personal retinue, wore helmets of this type. This suggests that such equipment was a symbol of prestige and power in Viking society.

Conservation and Exhibition

• Currently: The Gjermundbu helmet is on display at the Historical Cultural Museum of Oslo. It is considered one of the museum's gems, attracting visitors interested in the Viking Age and its legacy.

The Gjermundbu helmet is not only a highly valuable archaeological finding but also a window into the world of Viking warfare and its social hierarchies. It reflects not only mastery in metalworking but also the deep symbolism of these weapons and armors for the Vikings of the medieval era.

The Kettle hat, also known as the war helmet or chapel de fer, is an iconic piece of medieval armor, notable for its design that resembles a cooking pot or cauldron, hence its name in English. This helmet was made of iron or steel and was characterized by its wide brim, providing effective protection. Throughout the centuries, the Kettle hat has been used by various types of fighters, becoming an essential element of war equipment in the Middle Ages.

Main characteristics of the Kettle hat

The design of the Kettle hat is simple yet extraordinarily functional, contributing to its popularity during the Middle Ages. Some of its outstanding features include:

• Cone-shaped or rounded dome: protects the top of the head.
• Wide brim: provides additional protection for the face, neck, and shoulders.
• Robust construction: made from a single piece of metal or by joining plates.
• Facial opening: ensures good visibility and breathing.
• Option for additional protection: allows for the addition of a mesh coif to protect the neck and sides of the head.

History and use

The Kettle hat emerged in Europe around the 12th century and was extensively used until the 16th century. It found common ground among various groups of fighters, such as:

• Infantry: its low cost and ease of production made it ideal.
• Archers and crossbowmen: did not obstruct vision during combat.
• Light cavalry: balanced protection and mobility.

Its effectiveness lay in the balance between protection and comfort, allowing soldiers to see and breathe without restrictions, while also protecting them from arrows and downward strikes.

Advantages of the Kettle hat

This medieval helmet offered various advantages over other designs of the time:

• Effective protection: especially against blows and projectiles from above.
• Visibility and ventilation: the wearer could see and breathe freely.
• Lightweight and comfortable: suitable for prolonged use.
• Simple production: easy to manufacture in large quantities.
• Versatility: suitable for different types of fighters and combat situations.

Variations and evolution

Over time, the design of the Kettle hat evolved, adapting to new needs:

• Movable visors: added for greater facial protection.
• Extensions: for better neck protection and sides of the head.
• Reinforcements and ribs: increased the helmet's durability.
• Chainmail and gorgets: incorporated for added protection.

By the 16th century, more elaborate variations such as the Spanish morion and the Italian cabasset emerged, but the basic concept of the protective wide brim prevailed.

Legacy and influence

The design of the Kettle hat left a lasting mark on the history of military helmets. In World War I, it was reflected in the creation of the British Brodie helmet and the French Adrian helmet, both drawing on the idea of the protective wide brim. Today, the Kettle hat remains an iconic symbol in historical representations, film, and video games that take us back to the Middle Ages, faithfully representing the common soldier of the time.

The Kettle hat not only played a crucial role in the personal defense of medieval soldiers, but its design also influenced future generations of military equipment. It is an example of how a simple and effective solution can withstand centuries of technological evolution and remain relevant in many aspects.

The *bevor* stands out as a key piece in the history of medieval armor. Its main function, to protect the vulnerable areas of the face and neck, was crucial at a time when close combat posed a considerable risk of receiving fatal wounds. This component, often made from a single piece of steel or iron, was placed between the helmet and the breastplate, providing essential reinforcement against enemy attacks.

Origin and Historical Evolution

Since its emergence in the 14th century, the bevor became an inseparable component of the *sallet* helmet, a type of open helmet that required additional protection for the chin and throat. As combat techniques and tactics evolved, so did the bevor, especially during the 15th century, with the development of articulated versions known as *falling buffe* in the 16th century. These innovations allowed warriors to lift or lower the protection as needed, which was essential for facilitating communication and breathing in non-combat situations.

Features and Construction

The previously mentioned component was typically made from steel blocks 1 to 2 mm thick, handcrafted to fit the wearer. Here are some of its most notable features:

• Specific Protection: It provided comprehensive coverage for the chin, throat, and sometimes the neck and part of the left shoulder.
• Compatibility: It was designed to be used with *sallet*, *close helm*, and *burgonet* helmets.
• Composition: Made with fixed or articulated pieces, held in place with straps and buckles.
• Aesthetics: It showcased a refined Gothic design, often with polished or dark finishes that reflect the aesthetics of the period.

Importance and Function in Combat

Its place in combat was undeniable, reducing the risk of injuries to the lower face and neck, which are highly vulnerable areas. However, some knights chose not to wear the bevor constantly due to the restrictions it imposed on breathing and hearing. Stories of confrontations such as the Wars of the Roses emphasize that not wearing a bevor significantly increased the risk of severe injuries.

Differences between Bevor and Gorget

Although they are easy to confuse, the *bevor* and the *gorget* differ substantially. While the gorget is designed to protect the lower neck, the bevor extends to the chin, providing greater facial coverage. There are models that combine both concepts, such as chin gorgets, which offer even broader protection.

Legacy and Current Use

Today, the bevor remains an important element for history enthusiasts, appearing in historical recreations and *reenactment* events. Modern armorers faithfully reproduce this piece, offering multiple finishes and thicknesses, adapting to the aesthetic and functional needs of contemporary users.

In its evolution from a simple fixed plate to an elaborate articulated piece, the *bevor* reflects the adaptability of medieval armor to the challenges of combat. Even today, it stands out as an object of interest, preserving the rich tradition of European armor.